The attention to details!ģd argument is weird, it would make playing other parts actually feel worse gameplay-wise and more outdated (i do believe cs1-2 have the best combat systems even better than later parts).Ĭs1 is a "good" starting point, in a sense that it is better than later parts or somewhere mid-arc. I still remember seeing that one npc dude in cs3 and remembering him being a minor sidequest character in sky, it was hilarious. It's like starting reading harry potter from 5th volume or something, you would get the experience, but it wouldn't be a full course.Īnd that continuity not just about major characters or events. Missising out on that just makes it pointless to play trails in the first place imo. Never good enough.Īnd trails greatest stenght is just that, a detailed world building, connected plotlines, continuity of everyone and everything. I can't agree with "good enough job" right here. A "yeah, these 2 are liberl bracers" would never replace the sheer joy of seeing them after experiencing sky. You would never truly "feel" those moments when sky characters shows up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |